CAN Federation Governance Crisis: Defending Institutional Autonomy in Nepal’s IT Sector
8th October
The Computer Association of Nepal (CAN) Federation stands as the premier umbrella organization representing the nation’s information technology sector. However, the institution is currently navigating a critical governance crisis. Recent unilateral actions, unauthorized control over administrative resources, and breaches of statutory procedures have sparked a firm institutional response led by Acting President Chiranjeevi Adhikari.
This comprehensive report details the unfolding events, the core violations of governance, and the decisive legal and institutional measures being taken to protect Nepal’s leading technology body.
1. Unilateral Recommendations Violating the Statute
Under the established bylaws and governing statute of the CAN Federation, the authority to appoint representatives to national and international bodies rests exclusively with the President and the Central Executive Committee.
Despite this clear legal mandate, General Secretary Chandra Bilas Bhurtel utilized a letter dated Shrawan 19, 2083 from former President Nawaraj Kunwar to unilaterally recommend Kunwar for the position of ASOCIO Vice President. Executed on Bhadra 2 via the federation’s official email, this move completely bypassed the Central Executive Committee, constituting a severe violation of institutional protocols.
2. Administrative Lockdown and Compromised Communication
When executive office-bearers raised formal questions regarding the unauthorized recommendation during a meeting on Bhadra 4, the situation escalated further. Rather than engaging in constructive dialogue or following due process, actions were taken to obstruct governance:
Secretariat Closure: The central secretariat was shut down on Bhadra 5 to disrupt a scheduled Central Executive Committee meeting.
Digital Hijacking: Unilateral control was established over the federation’s official email system by altering passwords.
Seizure of Assets: Official stamps, registration records, and dispatch books were placed under unauthorized personal lock and key.
The CAN Federation firmly reiterates that it is a collective, democratic institution governed by transparent bylaws—not private property subject to individual control.
3. Misuse of Official Branding and Letterheads
The federation has also raised alarms regarding external correspondence issued directly from Jakarta. Using the official letterhead and stamp before any executive decision or formal resolution had been passed undermines the credibility and public trust of the organization.
Advertisement
Any independent statements or claims made using the federation’s identity without institutional backing are officially classified as unauthorized and misleading.
4. Official Stance on ASOCIO Representation
To clear any ambiguity among national stakeholders and international partners, the official meeting chaired by Acting President Chiranjeevi Adhikari has clarified that:
Only representations approved through legitimate, collective executive processes will be recognized as official.
Any self-proclaimed election victories or assembly participations conducted outside the bounds of the federation’s statutory framework hold no official validity.
5. Legal Recourse and Cyber Bureau Involvement
Taking swift action against administrative overreach and digital interference, the executive leadership has formally initiated legal proceedings.
Official complaints have been registered with the Cyber Bureau of Nepal Police and the District Administration Office, Kathmandu.
Strict legal and disciplinary actions will continue against any party attempting to compromise the autonomy, communication infrastructure, or physical assets of the federation.
6. An Appeal to IT Stakeholders and Members
The CAN Federation urges all provincial branches, district chapters, corporate affiliates, tech professionals, and well-wishers to rely solely on official communication channels.
As the driving force behind Nepal’s digital transformation, the federation remains fully committed to safeguarding its institutional dignity, resisting personal ambitions, and upholding the democratic values upon which it was founded.
For more: CAN Federation Governance Crisis
