AI Music Copyright Crisis Hits Nepal: Musicians File Cyber Bureau Complaint Against 95 YouTube Channels
2nd July 2026, Kathmandu
A major copyright crisis has struck the Nepali music industry as artificial intelligence (AI) clones of popular tracks are being used against their own original creators.
AI Music Copyright Crisis Hits Nepal
Led by prominent lyricist and model Bimal Adhikari, a coalition of more than 50 musicians has initiated legal action to protect their intellectual property rights from the growing threats of digital piracy and unchecked AI technology.
The group filed a formal complaint with the Nepal Police’s Cyber Bureau targeting 95 YouTube channels accused of replicating, modifying, and distributing AI-generated versions of their songs without proper authorization.
The AI Loophole: How Musicians Are Receiving Fake Copyright Strikes
The core of the issue lies in a highly exploitative loophole within automated digital rights management systems. According to the affected artists, bad actors are using AI tools to quickly generate and upload modified covers or versions of popular, trending tracks.
[Original Creation] ➔ [AI Channel Replicates Audio] ➔ [AI Version Uploaded First] ➔ [System Strikes Original Creator]
Because these AI channels frequently upload the modified songs to digital platforms before the original creators can complete the formal copyright registration process, automated algorithms mistakenly flag the real artists.
As a result, authentic musicians are receiving wrongful copyright strikes on their own channels, which can lead to:
Advertisement
-
Loss of monetization and ad revenue.
-
Suppressed algorithmic reach and visibility.
-
Complete termination of their official YouTube channels.
“The unauthorized and growing misuse of AI is directly threatening our creative rights, harming our livelihoods, and discouraging critical investment in the music industry,” the artists stated collectively.
Legal Repercussions Under Nepal’s Copyright Act, 2059
Nepal’s legal framework provides strict penalties for those found guilty of intellectual property theft and unauthorized digital distribution. Under the Copyright Act, 2059 (2002), individuals operating these rogue AI channels face severe legal consequences.
| Offense Category | Legal Penalty / Outcome |
| First-Time Offense | Fines up to Rs. 1 Lakh (100,000 NPR) and/or imprisonment for up to 6 months |
| Repeat Offenses | Significantly higher fines and extended prison sentences |
| Evidence & Assets | Immediate confiscation of all illegal materials and digital assets |
| Civil Damages | Mandatory financial compensation paid directly to the original copyright owner |
Looking Ahead: The Fight for Creative Rights
As AI platforms continue to advance globally, this collective action by Nepal’s music industry marks a defining historical moment for local digital creators.
The case brought forward by Bimal Adhikari and supported by dozens of veteran artists highlights the urgent need for tighter regulatory guardrails, updated platform algorithms, and localized digital policies to prevent human artistry from being eclipsed by automated plagiarism.
For more: AI Music Copyright Crisis Hits Nepal
