E-Commerce Directives 2082: CAN Federation Demands Zero API Fees and Tax Rebates for Nepalese Startups
17th January 2026, Kathmandu
The landscape of e-commerce in Nepal is on the verge of a major regulatory shift. As the government moves to formalize digital trade through the Electronic Commerce Directives, 2082, the Federation of Computer Association Nepal (CAN Federation) has submitted a high-impact proposal.
CAN Federation Demands Zero API Fees
Initiated and led by Senior Vice President and ICT Policy Coordinator Chiranjibi Adhikari (also CEO of One Cover Private Limited), the framework aims to transform the regulatory draft from a restrictive document into a catalyst for growth.
The focus has shifted from mere regulation to aggressive fiscal incentives, aiming to make Nepal a digital-first nation by removing the financial barriers that stifle Nepalese startups.
The CAN Federation Vice President Srijana Shrestha, Young E-Commerce Entrepreneur Surakchya Adhikari, Academic Expert Supriti Shakya, Pen Tester Engineer Swagat Aryal, Digital Marketing specialists Sanesh Lohani, and other stakeholders were present.
Zero-Cost Digital Infrastructure: The API Mandate
One of the most significant hurdles for new e-commerce portals in Nepal is the cost of integrating payment gateways. Currently, startups face high setup and maintenance costs from private players.
The CAN Federation Suggestion:
To truly digitize the economy, the government should mandate that API Integration Charges from major providers like Khalti, eSewa, and Fonepay be waived for startups.
The Goal: Integration fees and recurring transaction fees must be zero to encourage every small business to go online.
Government Role: The government should provide tax incentives to these Payment Service Providers (PSPs) in exchange for offering free services to the e-commerce sector.
Tax Rebates for Startup E-Commerce Portals
The current draft of the directive focuses heavily on compliance and penalties. However, the CAN Federation argues that sustainable growth requires “carrots,” not just “sticks”.
Tax Holiday: The federation proposes a significant Tax Rebate period for newly registered e-commerce startups.
Incentivizing Compliance: By offering tax breaks, the government can encourage informal social media sellers to register officially on the Department’s portal, effectively bringing them into the formal economy.
Eliminating Transaction Fees
For consumers to ditch cash, digital payments must be cheaper or at least equal to cash transactions.
The Proposal: The government should subsidize transaction fees so that the end-user and the merchant pay nothing extra for choosing digital over cash.
Policy Shift: Transaction fees should be abolished through a government-backed incentive scheme for banks and PSPs, ensuring that “Digital Nepal” is affordable for the masses.
Simplified “One-Door” API Registration
Instead of manual paperwork and visiting multiple offices, the CAN Federation is pushing for a tech-driven approach to business listing.
Auto-Listing: By using a Unified API with the Office of the Company Registrar, businesses should be automatically listed on the e-commerce portal the moment they are registered, syncing PAN, VAT, and OCR details automatically.
90-Day Window: For small and medium enterprises (SMEs), the federation suggests extending the compliance window to 90 days (up from 35), focusing on a “Technical Support Period” rather than immediate fines.
Key Highlights of the CAN Federation Conceptual Framework
This framework, developed under the leadership of Chiranjibi Adhikari and the CAN Federation’s team of cyber experts, rests on three non-negotiable pillars: Security, Simplicity, and Sovereignty.
Expert-Led Security & Certification
National Minimum-Security Standard (NMSS): The government should introduce an NMSS rather than general data protection rules.
Encryption Mandates: Drawing on professional cybersecurity experience, the framework insists on encryption for sensitive data (passwords, phone numbers).
Independent Certification: Testing and certification of platforms should be conducted by Independent Experts rather than government departments lacking technical specialization.
Collaborative Monitoring & Resolution
Joint Monitoring: Monitoring teams must include representatives from the CAN Federation to ensure fair and informed inspections.
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): The development of ODR mechanisms will help handle grievances digitally, speeding up the resolution process.
Data Sovereignty
Incentivized Localization: The guidelines should offer tax rebates for companies hosting data in local Tier-3 data centers, ensuring Nepalese citizens’ information remains within national borders.
Conclusion: This framework ensures that the Nepalese digital ecosystem remains secure, affordable, and driven by local innovation rather than just legal constraints. It positions Nepal not just as a consumer of global tech, but as a creator of a secure and competitive digital marketplace.
Federation of Computer Association Nepal (CAN Federation)
| Section (Dafa) | Existing Provision / Issue | Identified Problems | Suggestions for Amendment (CAN Federation) |
| Preamble | Focuses on transparency, security, and consumer protection | Weak focus on promotion, startups, and digital economy expansion | Must explicitly include business promotion, support for startups/SMEs, and digital economy expansion |
| Section 2 | Broad definition of “Businessperson” | Similar liabilities for platform operators, sellers, and intermediaries; lacks clarity on social media trade | Define and assign separate liabilities for different roles; create distinct provisions for social media trading |
| Section 3 | Mandatory listing of all e-commerce firms on the Department’s portal | Entry barrier for small Nepalese businesses, startups, and cottage industries | Implement phased listing based on turnover; enable “Auto-Listing” via a Unified API with the Office of the Company Registrar |
| Section 4 | Requirement for numerous documents like Cyber Audits and Policy Documents | Expensive and complex for small businesses; may encourage informal trade | Set minimum cyber security standards based on risk; allow “Self-Declaration” initially for startups with a preparation period |
| Section 5 | Mandatory listing within 35 days of directive issuance | 35-day limit is too short; provisions include harsh penalties for non-compliance | Provide 90 days for listing with initial orientation; use warnings/fines before strict legal action |
| Section 8(1) | Platforms must keep user details encrypted | Needs more clarity on sensitive vs. general data | Specifically encrypt sensitive data (passwords, phone numbers, DOB); use appropriate measures for general data |
| Section 8(2) | Immediate business closure in case of unauthorized access or data leaks | Impractical to stop all operations; disrupts buyers, sellers, and intermediaries | Notify the Department, but focus on recovery; ensure regulation does not lead to total business prohibition |
| Section 9 (1 & 2) | Mandatory digital payments; electronic invoices required for cash payments | COD is still a consumer preference; digital payment mandates may be misunderstood as the only valid form | Continue Cash on Delivery (COD) as a transitional measure; incentivize digital payments through cashback/discounts |
| Section 9 (3) | 7-day limit for refunds/returns if delivery is unsuccessful | 7 days is insufficient for all geographical regions and business models | Set 7 days for urban and 10–15 days for rural areas; clarify cost-sharing for returns between parties |
| Section 10 | Prohibition of misleading advertisements | Unclear liability between platform operators and sellers | Clearly define roles; platforms should not be liable for auto-playing ads from unknown third-party sources |
| Section 11 | Inspection and monitoring by multiple government bodies | Creates a burden of cost/time and an environment of fear for businesses | Implement a “One-Door System”; include CAN Federation and Sectoral related association representatives in monitoring teams |
| Section 12 | Grievance resolution within 15 days | 15 days may be insufficient for complex disputes | Allow flexibility in the timeline based on the nature of the dispute |
| Section 13 | Dispute Resolution Committee within the Department | Lacks representation from the private sector or business associations | Develop Online Dispute Resolution (ODR); involve CAN Federation or relevant associations in mediation before the Department |
| Section 15 | Ministry to set minimum IT standards and Department to certify platforms | Department lacks necessary certification expertise | Finalize IT standards in consultation with CAN Federation; allow certification by “Independent Experts” |
| Section 17 | Capacity building for Ministry and Department staff | Private sector representatives also need capacity building for secure operations | Include CAN Federation member representatives and staff in capacity-building programs |
For more: CAN Federation Demands Zero API Fees




